Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Health Secur ; 19(4): 379-385, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1066215

ABSTRACT

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)-approved respirators are required by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) when personal respiratory protection is used in US occupational settings. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the demand for NIOSH-approved N95 filtering facepiece respirators overwhelmed the available supply. To supplement the national inventory of N95 respirators, contingency and crisis capacity strategies were implemented and incorporated a component that endorsed the use of non-NIOSH-approved respiratory protective devices that conformed to select international standards. The development and execution of this strategy required the collaborative effort of numerous agencies. The Food and Drug Administration temporarily authorized non-NIOSH-approved international respiratory protective devices through an emergency use authorization, OSHA relaxed their enforcement guidance concerning their use in US workplaces, and NIOSH initiated a supplemental performance assessment process to verify the quality of international devices. NIOSH testing revealed that many of the non-NIOSH-approved respiratory protective devices had filtration efficiencies below 95% and substantial inconsistencies in filtration performance. This article reports the results of the NIOSH testing to date and discusses how it has contributed to continuous improvement of the crisis strategy of temporarily permitting the use of non-NIOSH-approved respirators in US occupational settings during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Environmental Health/standards , Filtration/standards , National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S./standards , Public Health , Respiratory Protective Devices/standards , Filtration/instrumentation , Humans , Internationality , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , United States
2.
J Occup Environ Med ; 62(10): 781-782, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-705719

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The proliferation of improvised masks during the COVID-19 pandemic has raised questions regarding filter effectiveness and safety. We sought to compare the effectiveness of commonly used improvised filter materials against N95 industry standards. METHODS: Six different filter materials commonly used in the community were tested using both single- and multi-layer configurations with the TSI 8130 automated filter tester in accordance with National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) standards for N95 respirators. RESULTS: Only three of the tested filter material configurations met N95 parameters with regard to filtration efficiency and pressure drop across the filter material-the: True-high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter, four-layer MERV 13 and 14 HVAC filters. CONCLUSIONS: Many proposed filter materials for improvised masks do not meet current industry standards and may pose safety and efficacy concerns. Care should be taken when selecting materials for this critical respirator component, particularly for health care workers or others at high risk for pathogen exposure.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Inhalation Exposure/prevention & control , Masks/standards , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Occupational Health , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Air Pollutants, Occupational/analysis , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Equipment Design , Equipment Safety , Female , Global Health , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Materials Testing , National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S./standards , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , Particle Size , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL